HR 7900 is the National Defense Authorization Act for 2023. Amendment 367 of US HR 7900 requires the U.S. Department of Defense to issue a report confirming that none of their contractors participate in or support any effort “based on a belief that Israel is oppressing Palestinians” that promotes boycotts for justice.
HR 7900 is the National Defense Authorization Act for 2023. Amendment 731 establishes that it is the policy of the U.S. to seek to abolish the UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and Israel, an entity established to investigate all alleged violations of international law surrounding the Unity Intifada.
S Res 232 is a non-binding resolution that attempts to frame support for Palestinian rights as antisemitism. The statistics and many of the examples cited in the resolution rely on the same conflation at work in the distorted IHRA definition. S Res 232, for example, lists statements by Members of Congress that Benjamin Netanyahu is an “ethno-nationalist” and describing Israel as an “apartheid state” as instances of antisemitism.
H Res 428 is a non-binding resolution that attempts to link an uptick antisemitic incidents in the US to criticism of Israel’s violent response to the 2021 Unity Intifada. The statistics cited for the alleged uptick rely on the same conflation at work in the distorted IHRA definition – and are produced by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), a pro-police anti-Palestinian organization that has been widely criticized for undermining and attacking progressive movements and communities of color.
This non-binding resolution (initially labeled PR625) condemns antisemitism and endorses the distorted IHRA definition of antisemitism as providing “a road map to defining and rooting out Antisemitism.” The IHRA definition conflates criticism of Israel and Palestinians’ lived experience and history with anti-Jewish hate, infringing on protected expression and exacerbating anti-Palestinian racism.
HB 30 is an antisemitism redefinition bill that requires state agencies to consider the distorted IHRA definition of antisemitism, including its contemporary examples that target advocacy for Palestinian rights, when addressing allegations of discrimination or in the context of hate crimes enhancements. The definition conflates criticism of Israel and Palestinians’ lived experience and history with anti-Jewish hate, infringing on protected expression and exacerbating anti-Palestinian racism. An amended version of the bill adds antisemitic imagery to the state’s definition of terrorism and defines antisemitism according to the IHRA definition, a definition that conflates criticism of Israel and Palestinians’ lived experience and history with anti-Jewish hate, infringing on protected expression and exacerbating anti-Palestinian racism.
This anti-boycott bill prohibits state contracts with a company for goods or services unless the contract includes a written certification that the company does not, and for the duration of the contract will not, engage in boycott activity against Israel or illegal Israeli settlements. This bill exempts contracts with a value of less than one hundred thousand dollars or with companies with fewer than ten full-time employees. Additionally, this bill prohibits public entities from adopting any procurement, investment, or other policies that have the effect of “allowing, inducing, or requiring a person or company” to boycott Israel or illegal settlements, a provision that targets divestment or other BDS campaigns at public universities.
This anti-boycott bill prohibits any public entity from entering into a contract with a company unless the contract includes a written certification that the company is not engaged in, and agrees for the duration of the contract not to engage in, a boycott of Israel or illegal Israeli settlements. The bill exempts contracts with a value of less than one hundred thousand dollars or with companies with less than 10 employees. The version that passed out of the House removed the monetary threshold. The bill also prohibits the state investment board from adopting any investment policy that would “have the effect of requiring or inducing any person to boycott Israel.”
AJR 211 is a joint resolution that adopts the distorted IHRA definition of antisemitism, including its contemporary examples targeting advocacy for Palestinian rights. These antisemitism redefinition efforts conflate criticism of Israel and Palestinians’ experience and history with anti-Jewish hate, infringing on protected expression and exacerbating anti-Palestinian racism. Related resolution: SJR 113.
SJR 113 is a joint resolution that adopts the distorted IHRA definition of antisemitism, including its contemporary examples targeting advocacy for Palestinian rights, into state law addressing discrimination as well as other areas of law. These antisemitism redefinition efforts conflate criticism of Israel and Palestinians’ experience and history with anti-Jewish hate, infringing on protected expression and exacerbating anti-Palestinian racism. Related resolution: AJR 211.
