This anti-boycott bill prohibits state investment in companies that boycott goods, products or businesses of Israel. The bill requires the state to create a blacklist of all investments that violate this prohibition. The bill makes an exception for companies providing humanitarian aid to the Palestinian people. Related bill: S3044.
This anti-boycott law requires state pension funds to withdraw investments from any company that boycotts the goods, products, or businesses of Israel or companies operating in Israel or territories occupied by Israel. The law requires the state to create a blacklist of companies that boycott Israel. Companion bill: A925.
This anti-boycott bill prohibits state investment in companies that boycott goods, products or businesses of Israel. The bill requires the state to create a blacklist of all investments that violate this prohibition. The bill makes an exception for companies providing humanitarian aid to the Palestinian people. Related bill: A4665.
This anti-boycott law requires the state to develop a blacklist of companies that boycott Israel and prohibits the state from investing in blacklisted companies. The bill also prohibits state contracts with a company unless the company provides a written certification that they are not and will not engage in boycotts of Israel or territories it occupies for the duration of the contract. Because SB 26 only applies to boycotts undertaken on a discriminatory basis, boycotts for Palestinian rights fall outside its scope.
This anti-boycott bill calls for the creation of a blacklist of companies that participate in a boycott of Israel or persons or entities doing business in Israel or “territories controlled by Israel,” language that reaches boycotts of Israel’s illegal settlements. It prohibits state investment in and requires the state board of investments to divest from blacklisted entities. The bill also prohibits state contracts with companies unless they provide a written certification that they are not and will not engage in boycotts of Israel for the duration of the contract. Because HB 501 only applies to boycotts undertaken on a discriminatory basis, boycotts for Palestinian rights fall outside its scope. Due to the efforts of members of Helena Service for Peace and Justice, the Montana Coalition for Palestine, and others, HB 501 was defeated.
This anti-boycott bill calls for the creation of a blacklist of companies that participate in a boycott of Israel or persons or entities doing business in Israel or “territories controlled by Israel,” language that reaches boycotts of Israel’s illegal settlements. It prohibits state investment in and requires the state board of investments to divest from blacklisted entities. Because HB 493 only applies to boycotts undertaken on a discriminatory basis, boycotts for Palestinian rights fall outside its scope.
This anti-boycott bill prohibits state contracts with and state investment in entities, including sole proprietorships and non-profits, that boycott Israel or territories occupied by Israel. The bill requires contractors to sign a written certification that they do not and will not engage in boycotts of Israel. It excludes contracts worth less than $1,000 or contractors who bid at least 20% less than other bidders. The bill calls for the creation of a blacklist of companies that boycott Israel and prohibits public retirement systems from investing in these companies. It also prohibits Arizona public entities from boycotting Israel, a provision aimed at discouraging divestment campaigns at public universities.
A federal court blocked enforcement of the law in September 2018, finding the plaintiff was likely to succeed in showing that the law violates his First Amendment rights and that the state’s continued enforcement of it would cause him irreparable harm. In 2019, Arizona amended the law (SB 1167) so it no longer applied to individuals like the plaintiff. The amendments altered the prohibitions related to state contracts, leaving in place those related to state investments.
This anti-boycott law amends Arizona’s 2016 law (HB 2617) to exclude sole proprietors, companies with fewer than 10 employees, and contracts worth less than $100,000 from the prohibition on state contracts with companies that boycott Israel or territories occupied by Israel. A federal court blocked enforcement of HB 2617 in September 2018, finding that the law would likely violate the First Amendment. These amendments, which are designed to remove the plaintiffs challenging the law from its reach, may reduce the number of individuals affected by the law, but fail to resolve the underlying constitutional issues.
The amended law leaves in place the written certification requirement for state contractors as well as the creation of a blacklist of companies in which state retirement plans are prohibited from investing.
This anti-boycott law requires state entities to create a blacklist of “businesses and business entities that are publicly traded and not based in the United States” that boycott Israel and territories it occupies. The law prohibits state entities from investing in or contracting with blacklisted entities for contracts of $1,000 or more. It also requires state funds to divest from blacklisted companies. Blacklisted companies can be removed from the blacklist upon written certification that they no longer boycott Israel. Related bills: SF 2281.
This anti-boycott bill requires state entities to create a blacklist of “businesses and business entities that are publicly traded and not based in the United States” that boycott Israel and territories it occupies. The law prohibits state entities from investing in or contracting with blacklisted entities for contracts of $1,000 or more. It also requires state funds to divest from blacklisted companies. Blacklisted companies can be removed from the blacklist upon written notification that they no longer boycott Israel. SF 2281’s companion bill, HF 2331, was passed into law.
